Site Navigation Page Content

Recent Faculty News

Professor Mark Hall

Professor Mark Hall quoted in New York Times about ‘How an adverse Supreme Court ruling would send Obamacare into a tailspin’

February 27th, 2015

Professor Mark Hall tells The New York Times that policy environment does not work well in the article,  “How an Adverse Supreme Court Ruling Would Send Obamacare Into a Tailspin,” published on Feb. 27, 2015.

Continue reading »

Wake Forest Law School Professor Kami Simmons

Professor Kami Chavis Simmons adds to further discussion on hate crime prosecution in the Muslim student murders

February 27th, 2015

Professor Kami Chavis Simmons is quoted by the Duke Chronicle in the following story: The murders of three Muslim students in Chapel Hill, N.C., earlier this month has brought national attention once again to how hate crimes are prosecuted in America. Continue reading »

Professor Kami Chavis Simmons

Professor Kami Chavis Simmons participates in SLU’s controversial ‘The Thin Blue Line: Policing Post-Ferguson’ symposium

February 23rd, 2015

Professor Kami Chavis Simmons, director of the Wake Forest Law Criminal Justice Program, spoke about how to police policemen during the “The Thin Blue Line: Policing Post-Ferguson” symposium at St. Louis University School of Law on Friday, Feb. 20, 2015.

Continue reading »

Professors Michael Curtis and Eugene Mazo urge U.S. Supreme Court to hear North Carolina redistricting case

February 23rd, 2015

On a day that North Carolina was blanketed with snow, Professors Michael Kent Curtis and Eugene Mazo were busy urging the United States Supreme Court to hear an important redistricting case.

Continue reading »

Professor Michael Curtis

Professor Michael Curtis writes in Huffington Post about ‘Our Debt to the Abolitionists’

February 20th, 2015

American slavery ended in the awful carnage of the Civil War. But to conclude Abolitionism was a failure that made no contribution to abolition of slavery (or to the cause of civil liberty) would be a grave mistake. Abolitionists divided between those who rejected political action and those who embraced it, between those who thought the Constitution was an agreement with Hell and those who read it as outlawing slavery, at least in all the federal territories. Continue reading »

More faculty news »